ABOLITION SUGARS

Sweet Freedom has been producing maple syrup for over a decade, we started making sorghum syrup in the last five years and on a good apple year we will make apple syrup/boiled cider. Maple Sugaring is a tradition passed on to us by our Native American ancestors to harvest sweetness directly from the sugar maple trees. Historically abolitionists used maple syrup as they boycotted the sugarcane plantation industry that relied on slave labor. As modern abolitionists, we embrace this patient process of building intimacy with the land to build community resistance to the prison walls that divide us from each other.

During the 19th century, as the Abolitionist movement gained momentum in the United States, activists sought ways to undermine the institution of slavery economically and morally. One significant area of focus was on products that relied heavily on slave labor—especially cane sugar. At the time, the sugar industry in the Caribbean and southern United States was notorious for its reliance on enslaved labor. To combat this, abolitionists advocated for alternatives like maple syrup, boiled cider, and sorghum syrup, which could be produced without exploiting enslaved people.

  • Maple syrup emerged as one of the primary alternatives promoted by abolitionists. Produced from the sap of maple trees in the northern United States and Canada, maple syrup did not rely on slave labor and could be harvested by free laborers. This natural sweetener provided a practical and ethical substitute to cane sugar, and abolitionists encouraged people in the Northern states to switch to maple syrup as a way to avoid supporting slavery.

    For example, pamphlets like Free Produce Advocate and others distributed by abolitionist societies encouraged Northerners to consider the ethical benefits of maple syrup. Maple syrup was already popular in New England, so the infrastructure for its production existed and could be expanded without any moral compromise.

  • In the 18th and early 19th centuries, most cane sugar consumed in the U.S. and Europe was produced in the Caribbean and the American South, where enslaved Africans endured brutal conditions. Sugar was not only a common household item but also a luxury in many homes. Abolitionists recognized that boycotting sugar could serve as a powerful form of protest. They argued that refusing to purchase sugar produced by enslaved people would cut into the profits of slaveholders and pressure them to reconsider the use of slave labor.

    To raise awareness, abolitionist pamphlets, posters, and lectures highlighted the link between sugar consumption and the suffering of enslaved people. Well-known abolitionists, including the Quaker community, were particularly outspoken, urging households to “choose their sugar with care” by boycotting slave-produced sugar.

  • Boiled cider, made by concentrating apple cider through boiling, became another alternative sweetener promoted in abolitionist circles. Apple orchards were common in the northern states, where free labor was the norm. Boiled cider, though not as sweet as cane sugar, provided a natural, locally produced sweetener that could be used in baking and cooking.

    Because it was readily available in apple-growing regions, boiled cider was an accessible and economical substitute for those interested in supporting the abolitionist cause. Cookbooks from the time included recipes using boiled cider as a sweetener, emphasizing that it was a local product untainted by the labor of enslaved people.

  • Sorghum syrup, made from sweet sorghum cane, became popular as a sweetener in the U.S. later in the 19th century, especially after the Civil War. However, even before this period, some abolitionists were exploring it as an option. Sorghum cane was adaptable to various climates and could be grown and processed in the North by free labor. Sorghum syrup became especially popular in the Midwest and southern states as an alternative to molasses and cane sugar.

    The idea of “free-labor” sweeteners was central to the abolitionist movement’s economic strategy. Free-labor sorghum syrup offered a way to support a domestic, slavery-free industry. The spread of sorghum cultivation aligned with the abolitionist message that consumers could support freedom by purchasing products untainted by slavery.

  • The efforts by abolitionists to promote alternatives to cane sugar helped foster awareness about the economic impact of consumer choices. Although the broader movement eventually led to the end of slavery, the campaign for ethical sweeteners had a lasting influence. It demonstrated that consumer goods could be politically and morally significant and inspired similar boycotts in later social movements.

    1. Williams, S., & Smith, R. (2015). The Maple Syrup Book. Canada Maple Publishers.

    2. “Maple Syrup Production and the Sugar Maple Tree.” National Maple Syrup Producers Association. Retrieved from northamericanmaplesyrup.org

    3. Jones, M., & Hale, L. (2018). Sweet Sorghum: A Guide to Syrup Making. University of Agriculture Press.

    4. “Sweet Sorghum for Syrup Production.” Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education (SARE). Retrieved from sare.org

    5. Drescher, S. (1986). Capitalism and Antislavery: British Mobilization in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.

    6. Boyer, P. S., & Nissenbaum, S. (1974). Salem Possessed: The Social Origins of Witchcraft. Harvard University Press.

    7. Smith, C. L. (2000). The Emergence of the Free Produce Movement in the United States. Journal of American Studies, 34(2), 229-254.

    8. The Free Produce Movement: Abolitionist Efforts to Avoid Slave-Made Goods. Quaker Heritage Press. Retrieved from qhpress.org